Incels and the Echoes of Nature: A Speculative Return to Evolutionary Realities (Continued)

Incels and the Echoes of Nature: A Speculative Return to Evolutionary Realities (Continued)

Situationships as Modern Harems: Proof of Reproductive Reversion

Building on the idea that incels signal a return to nature's unequal mating dynamics, let's examine contemporary evidence in the form of "situationships" - those ambiguous, non-committed arrangements where multiple women orbit a single high-value male, effectively sharing him without the bindings of traditional monogamy. This phenomenon isn't mere anecdote; it's a cultural shift amplified by social media and dating apps, where women, empowered by choice, gravitate toward alpha providers, leaving the masses in celibate limbo. In this setup, the Pareto principle reigns supreme: a select few men monopolize romantic and reproductive access, mirroring the polygynous structures of our primate ancestors or even historical figures like Genghis Khan, whose Y-chromosome legacy persists in millions today. Situationships, then, aren't a bug of modern dating but a feature of evolutionary regression, where enforced monogamy's guardrails have crumbled, allowing natural selection to favor the elite once more. The incel underclass grows as a direct result, their exclusion a byproduct of this concentrated mating success.

Elon Musk: Wealth as a Proxy for Evolutionary Fitness?

A prime exhibit in this argument is Elon Musk, the oft-cited richest man in the world (though one might quibble over hidden banking elites or shadowy fortunes that dwarf his). Musk has fathered at least 12 children with multiple women, including high-profile partners like Grimes and employees at his companies. This reproductive prolificacy exemplifies how modern "high value" can subvert traditional monogamy, with women willingly entering polyamorous or serial arrangements to bear his offspring. In a post-monogamous world, Musk's wealth and influence act as supercharged signals of fitness - resources that ensure survival and status for progeny, much like a dominant stag's antlers in the wild. Yet, here's the speculative twist: Musk isn't "high value" by pure natural selection standards. His appeal stems from artificial constructs like capital accumulation and technological innovation, not innate physical dominance or genetic superiority. In a pre-civilization context, without societal buffers, Musk's ectomorphic build and intellectual quirks might not secure mates against brawnier rivals. This highlights how monogamy's disruption has warped selection: Wealth props up otherwise unremarkable males, allowing them to "cheat" evolution's game, much like the low-quality providers of yore. But as society reverts, even Musk's empire might not shield against rawer criteria.

The True Apex: Athletes as the Pinnacle of Male Evolution

If Musk represents a socioeconomic hack on natural order, then consider the counterpoint: professional athletes, particularly NBA players, who embody the peak of human male evolution through a blend of physical prowess and cognitive acuity. These men - towering, athletic specimens like LeBron James or Kevin Durant - combine genetic gifts of height, speed, strength, and coordination with the intelligence needed for strategic gameplay, endorsements, and post-career ventures. In evolutionary terms, they are the silverbacks of our species: Their traits signal superior survivability, from hunting prowess in ancestral environments to modern displays of dominance on the court. This isn't hyperbole; studies in evolutionary psychology suggest women are drawn to such physical indicators as proxies for good genes, amplifying hypergamy in a selection-free market.

The proof? Observe the extraordinary lengths some women go to conceive with these paragons. Scandals abound: Groupies, paternity suits, and calculated pursuits where women forgo protection or even sabotage contraception to secure a child (and often, child support) from NBA stars. Reports from outlets like TMZ detail women traveling cross-country, infiltrating VIP circles, or leveraging social media for access, all in pursuit of genetic lottery tickets. This behavior underscores the argument - women aren't just sharing these high-value males; they're competing fiercely to reproduce with them, echoing animal mating rituals where females select the fittest sires. In contrast to Musk's resource-driven appeal, an NBA athlete's value is primal, unmediated by wealth alone (though fame adds layers). If incels represent the filtered-out masses, these athletes are the 1% thriving in the natural order's revival, their lineages set to dominate as monogamy's illusions fade.

Broader Ramifications: A Call for Reflection

This continuation of the incel narrative isn't an endorsement of despair but a provocation: As situationships proliferate and icons like Musk or athletes hoard reproductive success, society must grapple with the fallout. Will we embrace bioenhancements to level the field, or let natural selection cull the "low-quality" as it did for eons? The incel subculture, in its raw frustration, might just be the canary in the coal mine, warning of a future where evolutionary truths override our egalitarian dreams.

: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog (Psychology Today article on situationships and modern dating dynamics in the context of evolutionary psychology)
: https://www.biography.com/business-leaders/elon-musk (Biography.com profile on Elon Musk, detailing his family and relationships)
: https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/ (Forbes profile on Musk's wealth and influence, with notes on his personal life)
: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC (NCBI study on evolutionary psychology and female attraction to athletic physiques)
: https://www.tmz.com/ (TMZ archives on NBA player paternity scandals and groupie culture, illustrating women's pursuits)